Quote Originally Posted by Randi View Post
My question too. I doubt it would be allowed here!

A few centuries ago, it was normal to have up to approx. 6-10 children, but imagine if this goes on and on and on.... how long do you think our planet can cope?
Randi,

Last century my mom had six......

The 'moral' outrage is really funny out here. Instead of being angry at the stupid doctor, the masses are angry at the stupid woman.

Yes, we all pay taxes and have to support this debacle in human form, but no one seems to mind that we all have to pay for the stupid people who the government has to help out because they bought houses they could not afford, invested money they had in stupid stocks. We have to hand out money to banks and other businesses because of their stupidity.

It's far easier to unload on some dumb dingleberry because she has a face and is not a faceless giant of industry.


Also, there are the arguements about the government regulating the 'birth' industry- Women complain about it all the time, but want their cake too.

If the government stepped in an outlawed all in-vitro births you would have a real hell storm here in the U.S.

It's o.k. for some women to have a set of twins or triplets-but by the same token, there are the people/couples so effing desperate to have their 'own' kids that they would have four or five embryos implanted to be guaranteed one child.

It's the circus that AMerica is sometimes!