As to the rather base comments made about the current POTUS in this thread, I'm glad to see everyone respects the voters of this country.
As to the rather base comments made about the current POTUS in this thread, I'm glad to see everyone respects the voters of this country.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
I just can't help but think about the uproar if one of their officials had come here and one of our citizens had done that to them. I cna just HEAR it now
Heck even Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came to Columbia University and the US was able to treat him with respect even though he has made his hatred of the US and Israel etc known to the world. yet he was treated with respect when he came here. if he hadn't been treated with respect people would be calling for the death of those who insulted him... kind of like when a cartoon about Allah was printed and people FREAKED ... yet a cross in a jar of urine was considered art
I don't know...
A lot of people on here are vehemently disagreed with... but would you assault them just because they said something that hurt your feelings? Would you find it funny if one PT member threw things at another PT member just because they didn't agree with their position.
No one is saying they shouldn't have the right to free expression... but he only has the right to free expression... NOT to have people agree with his actions.
and there is a difference between disagreeing with the POTUS and trying to assault him. I don't AGREE with Obama but I would NEVER try to hurt him or personally insault him in the worst way I could imagine.
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
I have total respect for the rights granted under the Constitution of the United States. I think 20 years of my life defending the government and the document that guides it would pretty much answer that question.
HOWEVER......
I refuse to stand by while people use their rights to belittle Constitutionally elected representatives and the people who voted for them.
If you disagree with a policy decision which has been made, fine, state that.
Calling someone an idiot and by extension calling the millions who voted for them idiots is a tad over the top.
I disagree with decisions the current President has made, but he's still the POTUS, and as such I will give him the respect that THE OFFICE deserves.
I disagree with many of the campaign promises and platform statements made by the President Elect, but would never call him an idiot.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
Bush may have dodged the thrown shoe, but his press secretary was
not so lucky. She has a black eye from the ruckus. She looks terrible.
What was she doing there anyway?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
I've Been Boo'd
I've been Frosted
Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.
Eleanor Roosevelt
OOOOOH ouch... THAT looks really painful. Poor lady
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
What I find…well amusing I suppose…is you want the maximum stretch of interpretation of the Second Amendment (guns) but want to limit the interpretation of the First Amendment (free speech).
Blagojevich is a constitutionally elected official. He is also an idiot. You suggest it is wrong to say that. I disagree.
George Bush is an elected official who has squandered the good reputation of the United States, lied to the people of the country and the world and sacrificed over 4,000 Americans to his lies.
I do not believe he or any other elected official should be protected from criticism.
And I not believe criticism of him or Clinton or Obama when he gets into office - or Pierce or Harding or any other man who sat in the oval office shows disrespect for the position of president or for the constitution.
Otherwise the Founding Fathers would have written the first amendment to say…”freedom of speech except when criticizing government officials.”
Thankfully, they did not.
I remain baffled to why you have not expressed any disgust at people calling Blagojevich an idiot, etc. Or various congresspersons.
Your disgust over disparaging remarks toward elected officials seems to only apply to either politicians you like or posters with whom you disgaree.
I have disagreed with politicians here, disagreed with policy, but frankly I don't remember calling any elected official an idiot.
Posters, yes, but normally with cause and premeditation.
In Private messages? possibly.
In an open forum? Nope.
Gov. Blagojevich may turn out to be the most corrupt politician since Boss Tweed (It's Tamany Hall in NYC, BTW, not Tamany, NY), but he's still the Governor of Illinois.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
First let me thank you for pointing out that I left the word "Hall" out after Tamany.
But back on topic....
Interesting that the word "idiot" offends you but "moron" does not.
I will watch. Next time RICHARD goes on one of his rants about Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi -- or other Democrats he dislikes -- when he rants about the clothes they wear, whether they have had a face lift or not -- calls them (or himself I am not really sure ) morons and worse -- I will see if your sensibilities are riled by those affronts to constitutionally elected officials and the people who elected them.
It hasn't happened yet. But strangers things have occurred I suppose.
And I am fascinated that your find it acceptable to call a poster an idiot but not an elected official.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks