Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: The US Constitution

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, PA - USA
    Posts
    1,569
    Thank you for the civics lesson. A small shame that most people do not understand the process you explained.

    Obama as President? Fine. Obama as President with an entirely Democratic legislature? Yikes. There needs to be balance.

    Like I have said before, several times... I HOPE and PRAY I am wrong. But I fear that Barack Obama wants to turn the Constitution into a document of entitlements, rather than freedoms.
    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut."

    - Homer Simpson


    "If the enemy opens the door, you must race in."

    - Sun Tzu - Art of War

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Puckstop31 View Post
    Obama as President? Fine. Obama as President with an entirely Democratic legislature? Yikes. There needs to be balance.
    May I ask you a question, seriously? Did you feel this same way back when Bush was President and both the House and Senate were Republican?

    I was concerned and expressed that to some friends. They pooh-poohed me. But the same sort of things happened then that you portend will happen if and when next Tuesday.

    I much prefer if there is a balance in the Government.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Ramon,CA
    Posts
    1,822
    Excellent post ES. As always The fear mongering is what annoys me most. It's simply ignorance. If you look at facts, the fear goes away.
    I think Grace brings up an interesting point. We VOTE for who we want. If the country wants 100% on either side, it's up to the voters. (God help us!) Oi vey!
    Last edited by kitten645; 11-01-2008 at 12:52 PM. Reason: spelling

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, PA - USA
    Posts
    1,569
    Quote Originally Posted by kitten645 View Post
    I think Grace brings up an interesting point. We VOTE for who we want. If the country wants 100% on either side, it's up to the voters. (God help us!) Oi vey!
    Sure. But then they just go and do whatever the hell they want. Regardless of what they said to get elected.

    Until we break the stranglehold the two parties have on us.... It's all going to be the same. We need to stop fighting each other and focus on forcing THEM to do what they say they should do.
    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut."

    - Homer Simpson


    "If the enemy opens the door, you must race in."

    - Sun Tzu - Art of War

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Posts
    20,902
    There is slim chance that only one party will be elected to Congress.

    All of the House members are up for election every two years. Their terms start in even numbered years, including this one. All 435 are up this year.

    The Senators are elected for 6 year terms. About 1/3 of them are up for re-election every 2 years on even numbered years.

    http://www.mahoney.house.gov/index.p...temid=99999999

    Plus there are always some Independents sprinkled through the mix.
    Maybe more Independents need to be elected to Congress to keep an eye on the Dems and the Reps.
    No matter what anyone does, someone some where will be offended some how!!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    MY BLESSINGS:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Grandma (RB), Chester, Angel, Chip

    Leonardo (RB), Luke (RB), Winnie, Chuck,

    Frankie

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    WHERE YOU ARE IS WHERE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, PA - USA
    Posts
    1,569
    Lets hope that the Dems do not get a filibuster proof Senate.

    And I totally, totally agree that we need a LOT more independant/3rd party people in the legislature.
    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut."

    - Homer Simpson


    "If the enemy opens the door, you must race in."

    - Sun Tzu - Art of War

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seward's Folly, AK
    Posts
    3,679
    The problem is that many on the left think the Constitution can be interpreted to fit their mode of how things should be. The Fairness Doctrain, the AWB, and taxing ourselves into prosperity are prime examples of the liberals going against the intent of the Constitution.
    I have a HUGE SIG!!!!



    My Dogs. Erp the Cat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson
    Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, PA - USA
    Posts
    1,569
    Quote Originally Posted by Grace View Post
    May I ask you a question, seriously? Did you feel this same way back when Bush was President and both the House and Senate were Republican?

    I was concerned and expressed that to some friends. They pooh-poohed me. But the same sort of things happened then that you portend will happen if and when next Tuesday.

    I much prefer if there is a balance in the Government.
    100% absolutley, YES. What Bush did is proof of just how little difference there is between the two major parties.

    Balance, good. I'd much prefer WAY, WAY, WAY less federal government. But they got most people right where they want them.... Looking to them to solve their problems.

    How sloth we have become as a people. Quite sad, no?
    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut."

    - Homer Simpson


    "If the enemy opens the door, you must race in."

    - Sun Tzu - Art of War

Similar Threads

  1. The US Constitution
    By Puckstop31 in forum Dog House
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 02:07 PM
  2. New Preamble To The Constitution
    By wombat2u2004 in forum Dog House
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-21-2007, 10:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com