Gosh! The emperor...or empress in this case...has no clothes! (Although that is rather inaccurate as the woman wears suits and shoes that cost a real pretty penny! I assume the campaign fund pays for those...)

Which is more amusing? Her 9% tax rate or the pitiful 1.5% charitable contribution? But is does explain the scorn she expressed in her convention speech for community activist!

The article quoted above does not include her refusal to pay taxes on money the state of Alaska gives her when she works from home. Gosh, if she paid taxes on that she might be up to 10%!

So someone who has been at the public trough for how many years...gettin' paid with tax dollars

I suppose her more ardent supporters will fall back on ad hominem attacks.

Liberal media! Lefties!