Politics and religion.

[Puckstop31]

Regarding Ifill's book - it's not as though anyone was trying to hide the existence of it. From Politico -




Seems like some were not doing their homework?

Whatever... Not doing homework, whatever.

Do you think it's fair that the moderator for the debate stands to profit from an Obama victory? Do you think there might be just a smidge of bias???

[Grace]

Whatever... Not doing homework, whatever.

Do you think it's fair that the moderator for the debate stands to profit from an Obama victory? Do you think there might be just a smidge of bias???

Makes no difference what I think, nobody will listen to me, or you for that matter. Bias - possibly; but now that this is all over the news, it would seem Ifill would bend over backwards to be fair and balanced.

If anyone had bothered to ask me what I would like to see at a VP Debate - I would like it to be more free-wheeling like that between McCain and Obama; I would like to have seen Rachel Maddow as moderator.

[RICHARD]

I would like to have seen Rachel Maddow as moderator.

All political stuff aside.

What is it with Madcow?

Her adam's apple is second to the the other gal, can't think of her name at the moment- and the weird head bob/jut that she does when she wants to make a point.

She remindes me of a Women's Studies teacher at the local community college. The kind of personr that you see on a campus sidewalk, then cross to the other side of the street because you just don't want to deal with saying 'Good afternoon/morning" to her.

[lizbud]

All political stuff aside.

What is it with Madcow?

Her adam's apple is second to the the other gal, can't think of her name at the moment- and the weird head bob/jut that she does when she wants to make a point.

She remindes me of a Women's Studies teacher at the local community college. The kind of personr that you see on a campus sidewalk, then cross to the other side of the street because you just don't want to deal with saying 'Good afternoon/morning" to her.

What's wrong Richard, Rachel doen't show enough cleavage for ya or do
you just try to avoid intelligent women?

Here's something more your style I think...... A nude Sarah Palin.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/entert...0,273867.story

[Grace]

All political stuff aside.

What is it with Madcow?

What's not to like, Richard? She is intelligent, polite, self-deprecating, and, I think, attractive.

And what could you possibly find wrong with this -

“I don’t get mad because somebody has a different perspective than me,” she explains. “I get mad at people who are screwing things up in the country, and screwing things up in the world. But if you disagree with me about even serious issues, and you’re willing to debate them with me in a civil way without being insulting, I’m going to enjoy that conversation.”

[RICHARD]

What's not to like, Richard? She is intelligent, polite, self-deprecating, and, I think, attractive.

And what could you possibly find wrong with this -

LOL, I am only a fan of cleavage on the WEATHER CHANNEL!!

I agree that it's the people who are screwing up the world. I just have a problem with the way she delivers the news and the little snarky thing she does at the end. I know she has to do the Olbermann thing too-be a little over dramatic too!

IF you want the truth?

She reminds me too much of my knuckleheaded sister- They both could use a little more makeup- I dislike the mortuary approved generic spatula applied makeup. She is attractive but it's her manner that bugs me-My sis is very snarky, I WANT COLOR IN MY NEWREADERS!.

P.S. I did look at the nude SP painting, that would tell me more about the Bush Doctrine.