I'd rather see a child with parents who care than a child sitting around waiting to be adopted.
It just doesn't make sense sometimes to eliminate possibly loving, caring parents based on minor criteria.
I'd rather see a child with parents who care than a child sitting around waiting to be adopted.
It just doesn't make sense sometimes to eliminate possibly loving, caring parents based on minor criteria.
The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.
As long as two people have a stable,loving home to raise a child, then
it shouldn't matter. I've always believed the child can never get back the
time lost waiting to be loved & cared for in a personal way that only a
committed parent can provide.
I've Been Boo'd
I've been Frosted
Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.
Eleanor Roosevelt
The important thing is for children to have loving parents. Or even parent (singular).
To leave a child in foster care simply because a prospective parent is gay, or another race - that is unacceptable.
The one thing that I do agree on is background screening for EVERYONE who wants to adopt.
Make that bacground screening with a free health check up too!
There are instances where a rigorous background check will uncover some details that will prevent any couple from adopting a child into their home.
I don't care if the parents have three heads and 12 legs between them-if they can guarantee the child's safety and well being-have at it.
I promise that if we ever establish a real world PetTalkville there will be no child - or pet of course - who is unwanted or unloved. Things like gender, sexual preference and skin color will have no bearing on who can raise and love a child.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks