Palin & book banning?

[Edwina's Secretary]

THe article puckstop posted (and I was about to post) has citations supporting the arguments made in the article.

The piece you posted, ES, shows no backup for it's assertions. The links are just generic links to the front pages of the websites.

It doesn't link to the Library Association article? Sorry.

I have read about it in the LA Times (quick...call that a liberal rag!) and TIME magazine. I am sorry to say I must work so I haven't time to find more articles.

What I do find very amusing is that this thread sat there all peaceful and quiet for a day...until I responded to it. You guys are so cute! (and so easy )

[Lady's Human]

Actually, ES, I was hoping this post would die as a thread.

I hate half truths posted as fact, without supporting evidence.

Frankly, I don't have a horse in this race, it irritates me just as much when people bring up Obama's Islamic faith.

What amuses me is that with all the mudslinging, Sen. Biden, who has a permanent case of foot in mouth disease, has been left untouched.

[Edwina's Secretary]

So you are telling me those librarians are lying. I always knew that! You just can't trust librarians!

When it comes to what happened a certain day in time...there are always as many stories as there are people who were there. I have no idea what link was posted that "disproves" it. But I have read others that suggest she did want to ban books.

What kind of evidence can there be? Or not be? What to believe or not believe? In my experience past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior.

So...I'm going with the librarians!