A BYB-induced color pattern in GSDs. They're supposed to resemble Pandas via their black and white mask. You can Google for pictures.
I personally can't see a bit of dalmatian or English setter in him.
I see ACD, shepherd, pit and/or lab. The angulation of the back legs definately says shepherd to me, the markings are very much ACD. The head, jaw line and chest could be pit, but I also see some lab in there.
I agree with others, "DNA" tests to determine breed are a total waste of money. One of my customers did that, with her 70 pound, gold colored, long haired, retreiver mix. We were all fairly sure the dog was a golden retriever mix, probably some lab and/or Irish setter in there. The results came back as something ridiculous ... I can't remember for sure now, but I think she was told the dog was something like Boston terrier and border collie. Ummmm .... no.
All dogs have the same DNA. The DNA is what makes a dog a dog, vs. a monkey or a parrot. A breed doesn't have unique DNA, a species does.
"We give dogs the time we can spare, the space we can spare and the love we can spare. And in return, dogs give us their all. It's the best deal man has ever made" - M. Facklam
"We are raised to honor all the wrong explorers and discoverers - thieves planting flags, murderers carrying crosses. Let us at last praise the colonizers of dreams."- P.S. Beagle
"All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. From the ashes a fire shall be woken, A light from the shadows shall spring; Renewed shall be blade that was broken, The crownless again shall be king." - J.R.R. Tolkien
Well, I mean, sure they're all canines, but it is in that same DNA that dictates how narrow their muzzles are, how many dew claws they have, their susceptibility to disease, their ear set, their tail set, their prey drive, their working ethics, etc. I agree that DNA tests are not accurate at this moment in time, but I wouldn't be surprised if they're refined upon in the future and become much more accurate. I agree that DNA tests are a tad too ambitious at this moment in time. I mean, we mapped out the canine genome just a couple years ago. I also think a lot of it depends on the company you're utilizing, too. Who knows!
Those Panda Shepherds look nothing like Pandas! They do, however, look very much like smooth coat Border Collies! lol
"Did you ever notice when you blow in a dog's face he gets mad at you?
But when you take him in a car he sticks his head out the window." -- Steve Bluestone
Thanks for all your input. Have you studied genetics at college? I am asking because that is one of the majors I am looking into, along with zoology or ecology.
Niņo & Eliza
This is a complicated question.![]()
I did have genetics when I was in high school (overseas) and different kinds of genetics courses when I was in college. But at the time I was taking these genetics courses decades ago, much of genetics was still in a sort of theoretical state because the actual genes were unknown and various species' genomes were yet to be worked out. Mendellian theory, punnett squares, & practical experience gave us theoretical genes that would 'explain' various behaviors we'd see in breeding.
It is only now with the growing technology of "molecular genetics"(as opposed to "classical genetics") that we are now able decode and look more closely into parts of the various (species) genomes. Now it has become possible to attribute a 'dominant' D ('d' is blue in dogs) to a specific part of genetic code in canines.
You will probably learn quite a bit about general genetics in basic college courses, but these don't teach very much at all about the genetics within different species. For example, the genetics of dogs and their coat patterns are different from that found in cats, or goats and zebras for that matter. (Or Mendel's sweet peas.) Even in the same species... PRA and dwarfism in two different breeds of dogs may actually involve different chromosomes or loci -- which means breeding affected dogs between two different breeds can produce a whole litter of unaffected carriers.
So yes, I did study genetics in school, but now, it's quite a different animal all together.
And it will continue evolve. For example, people attribute certain things to 'genetics' (such as diabetes and heart disease) but this can be a red herring because gene coding behaves little more than like software, like a computer program. If you change the food or other elements of the environment... you change the way some genes are expressed and they in turn, affect other genes within the individual in question.
Good luck with your future choices. You may find some studies/topics come more naturally for you but it may still be difficult to decide the best answer for you. Like some of us, you may take another path because challenge itself has its own rewards.
Last edited by SemaviLady; 05-10-2008 at 04:16 AM.
Thanks again. I guess I'll have to just settle with never knowing what breeds he is, but that's not too bad.
Niņo & Eliza
omg...and we're left hanging....I can't stand the suspense...lol
I have a blue heeler mix and she looks very similar. I am almost sure there is some blue heeler in this one. Mine is more spotted than marled like some blues, its a more uncommon coat. Dalmations are one of the breeds that were crossed to create the blue heeler so that may account for the coat like a dalmation, but this dog has a more stocky body and the shape of the head is much more like a blue, also.
I've never been able to figure out mine either. She's a blue/?
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks