All excellent points, Emeraldgreen, and ones that, I'm sure, the prosecutor will bring out. Picture this: when my dog, Charmin, of 18 1/2 years died of a heart attack, my son and I buried her on the back of our property after he got home from work at midnight. It was dark and raining, we had 5 acres of land and we buried her waaay in the back of the property, downhill and out of sight from the road and houses. My neighbor had the same amount of property and STILL she saw us bury my dog. Granted, we didn't do anything illegal or immoral but my point is that we were noticed. No one can ever convince me that those dead cats went unnoticed. People discard animals every day and, although I'm not saying that all the people who took their cats to Tiger Ranch just wanted to be rid of them, it's evident to me that many of them felt "out of sight, out of mind". And, if Lin has a mental illness, then your point is well taken; then the others who HAD TO KNOW ABOUT THE CONDITIONS AT TIGER RANCH had the same mental illness. No. Not in the real world. Perfect world: cats should be able to live outdoors unharmed and free. That is no longer the case. However, these poor cats would have stood a better chance had they been left to their own devices. Tiger Ranch was NOT a no-kill shelter. Those cats were killed slowly. And THAT is a crime in my book, whether or not the law sees it that way. Even if she is not prosecuted, what goes around comes around. I, for one, would not want to see what's waiting for me at the Rainbow Bridge, if I were she. No, y'know what? I take that back. Animals are so forgiving; I'm sure they've forgiven her already. Let's hope that the courts don't. Otherwise, justice will not have been served.Originally Posted by Emeraldgreen
Bookmarks