Doing this sorted out my dogs issues and they never had them again....so it can be good.
Dogs only come into conflict if they manage to raise their status to become too equal to the one above them and then try to challenge them for their position. If the dogs are treated in a way that stops them from raising their status, this won't happen. Also, many fight take place simply because the humans actually raise a lower dogs status. A dog who would remain lower if it was just for the other dogs. I bet if those three females were wild dogs, there wouldn't be the amount of fighting that there is living in a home with humans and, if there was, most of them would be simply quick scuffles with no injuries inflicted.
I know this technique is used by top behaviourists. In fact, I first read of this idea in one of John Fishers books. He has now passed on but he was one of the top pet behaviourists in the world and many U.S behaviourists learnt from him.
Still, as even he was having doubts as to the dominance thing between dog and human before he died, I don't think that the owner establishing dominance over the dogs would make any difference. It is now accepted that they view us as different and not part of their pecking order and do not try to dominate us as such.
When they show aggression towards us or misbehave, it is more about simply trying to protect resources that they are used to having and don't want to have taken from them. Obviously, they only do this with things they've had or have....not with things they've never had but would like to have. Thats what makes them different from people. The resources are not all tangible either as in objects like food or toys...it can account for any kind of aspect or a dogs life.
Bookmarks