Maybe I read it wrong, as I did skim through part of it, but I thought it said that the woman was suing her former partner for child support, not the sperm donor. I'll look at it again, maybe I am just confused?
Maybe I read it wrong, as I did skim through part of it, but I thought it said that the woman was suing her former partner for child support, not the sperm donor. I'll look at it again, maybe I am just confused?
Originally Posted by JenBKR
That is how I read it as well, not that the donor was being sued. Maybe I'm misunderstanding as well, but from what I read it seemed one partner was suing the other partner for child support.
I skimmed the latter half of it but I couldn't really see where the actual donor was being sued?The couple paid for the insemination and went together to the clinic where T.F. was inseminated. Her partner signed on the line designated "spouse's signature" at the sperm bank, according to legal papers.
Mom to Raven and Rudy the greyhound
Missing always: Tasha & Tommy, at the Rainbow Bridge
I wish I could find the article from the paper here yesterday. it clearly stated in that article that they wanted child support from the sperm donor and wanted his benefits even though he has since passed away.
EDITED: LMAO I'm such a dummy..... I didn't read this article before I posted it I just thought it was the same one LOL this one is from 2004 hahahahaha. Oops. let me see if I can find the real one
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
Sounds confusing. But it would seem ridiculous to me for the donor to be litigated against.
EDIT: Just read your edit. No wonder I was confused. I didn't even notice the date on it.
Mom to Raven and Rudy the greyhound
Missing always: Tasha & Tommy, at the Rainbow Bridge
haha you are just trying to confuse us, aren't you? You do know how easy that is, don't you?![]()
Originally Posted by JenBKR
I am afraid I was the most confused LOL that's what I get for not paying close attention..... it's all the pregnancy's fault... that's my story and I'm sticking to it hahaha
I did put the correct link at the top of the page now if you want to read it![]()
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriot...480.xml&coll=1
here is another link.
So it wasn't annonymous and he was present at the birth.... but I still don't think that makes him liable. To me that opens a new legal precedent for future sperm donors in cases like this to be liable for child support.
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks