I don't think we need to resort to primary school insults here. I'm sure she is familiar with the definition of 'facist', and quite frankly to label someone as such is appalling. You may claim to be the more experienced party here but the anger that comes across in this post does not show this in its best light. Perhaps have a go at rephrasing and maybe you will be credited with more authority on the matter.Originally Posted by Puckstop31
Plus, as yet, how do you know it was her who asked the link to be removed? That's a shot in the dark if I ever saw one.
And finally, I believe lizbud has been very fair throughout this whole thread. It was her who stood up against someone sharing her own views when that person called another 'crazy'. I would say that's pretty fair. I don't claim to be particularly fair as I know my opinions won't be changed. How fair do you claim to be, just out of interest?
I have been enlightened a little by this thread, were it not for the ravines of brewing tensions that have to be crossed to get to the bare-boned facts. I, as much as others, think a debate is spineless unless you can relate to facts on the opposite side. It can strengthen your own opinions in more ways than one and widens your horizons on the matter. So please, continue to post your views, but don't expect that by dictating them you will get very far.
Perhaps I might even go as far to say that I've found it interesting how a couple of good points from one angle are blindly ignored by the other, and that goes for both sides. It seems that whilst people on either side appear to have all the answers, they also seem to be selective about the ones they share.







Reply With Quote
Bookmarks