Thanks guys.

It's a tricky favour to ask for really because you have to be right on the perspective. As Meg needs to be as large in the composite as possible, that means that not much around her will show within the composite. As you can see in my photo of her, the viewers view only goes back a few yards to the fence before it is cut off by the top of the photo. This is why doing hills will be tricky...because they are generally quite a way off for them to look small behind a little dog and that means they'd be way higher than the top of the image if you understand what I mean.

BCollie_kelly - Thanks for those photos. With larger dogs like BCs, you have to be further away from the dog to fit it in the frame and then you get more background in as a result see...the same sort of effect as using wide-angle lense. With little dogs, getting more background in is far more difficult unless you have the dog small in the frame or it's on a hill so the ground behind it drops down and leaves a view for whatever might be further off from that hill...in other words, you'd have to be looking down at the view rather than across or up.

I've been asking for ideas in other places too and many people seem to suggest having the grass in the foreground and then having a blurred out hedge or bushes where the fence should be. I was thinking of that same idea myself really. Unless I change the lay of the ground directly behind where Meg is standing, the placement of her feet means I have to keep the ground under her exactly the same but doing this is notoriously difficult and I don't want to add anymore stresses where this piece of concerned.

Thanks again everyone who posted. I'll be back with the wip thread soon, lol.