So Who watched the Jesus Tomb last night

[DrKym]

MOFF,

On this point, you are entitled to your opinion, however bear in mind, that even several Christian leaders have agreed that since the Bible has been interpreted by millions in many different ways, and that there is evidence in the Bible itself, to support Jesus ressurecting in his spiritual form, that the finding of his tomb would be a wondrous thing.

It does not and would not negate the ressurection, or the fact that he existed. It would be simply a wondrous find and a sacred site.

[momoffuzzyfaces]

MOFF,

On this point, you are entitled to your opinion, however bear in mind, that even several Christian leaders have agreed that since the Bible has been interpreted by millions in many different ways, and that there is evidence in the Bible itself, to support Jesus ressurecting in his spiritual form, that the finding of his tomb would be a wondrous thing.

It does not and would not negate the ressurection, or the fact that he existed. It would be simply a wondrous find and a sacred site.

Sorry, we will have to disagree on this. My Bible says Jesus physically was ressurected. Now as to how others interprete their Bibles, well, that's up to them. I take mine literally. I guess the 500 people who saw him after he was ressurected must have all been on drugs or something!

As for errors being made in the copying from the ancent manuscripts, very few have been made. The scribes had to start over if even one error was found. It took them a long time to copy by hand. There were parts of one of the gospels found in the Dead Sea scrolls and it was almost word for word to the todays current version.

Because I respect everyone on the board I won't post on this thread again. I've tried to explain why to me this "find" is blaspheme. Nothing wonderous or sacred or even special about the find. Just another sad attempt to undermine Christianity.