Hate to weigh in on this, but as I do train and have certified Service dogs, Wal-Mart is within their rights to have done what they did.
Now stop and read before you all flame me.
ADA clearly states you cannot refuse service to an customer with a Service animal, yes the woman was treated rudely but her own account states she was able to complete her transaction.
Also if any other customer was upset or they stood to lose sales based on anothers discomfort, AND if the customer wasnt disabled and was causing this issue would they ask/require the customer to leave.
If the answer is Yes, then Wal-mart can ask her to remove the animal.
Another example is a person in a resturant, or movie theatre, if the animal is barking and/or behaving in a way that is disruptuve to other paying customers, then they can be asked to remove the animal.
There are no grounds for a lawsuit here, as both parties were in compliance.
Wal-mart could have handled it better, with a bit more class, however, they allowed the transaction to finish so they are legally in compliance.







Merry Holidays to One an All Blessed be
These things aren't always what they seem to be.




Bookmarks