Not trying to argue. What you stated is initially what i thought. However it's item 6 that has me wondering. Do 1 and 5 cover that or not? Would the "in part" only refer to pelts or skin, or would it refer to the fur itself?

(Section 308 (a) ...)

(1) CAT FUR- The term `cat fur' means the pelt or skin of any animal of the species Felis catus.

(5) DOG FUR- The term `dog fur' means the pelt or skin of any animal of the species Canis familiaris.

(6) DOG OR CAT FUR PRODUCT- The term `dog or cat fur product' means any item of merchandise which consists, or is composed in whole or in part, of any dog fur, cat fur, or both.

Quote Originally Posted by Freedom
When you read through the Act, go to the definition section. The term "cat fur" is defined as the pelt or skin. Similar definition for dog fur.

It can be challenging to write laws and get the terms right. Under this particular law, there is no conflict with using the shed/brushed out fur / hair of a dog or a cat. The animal is still alive. The law was enacted to protect the dogs and cats which were raised and killed as farm animals for the pelts and skins. Much as minks and chincillas have been farmed to make coats.

Folks who work with sheep's wool may have a term to apply to the fur and hair taken off the living animal, NOT attached to the skin / pelt. Of course, sheep have "wool," so that may help with the distinction right there.

Hope this helps!