Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Toys "R" Us baby contest sparks fuss...

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    indianapolis,indiana usa
    Posts
    22,881
    Quote:

    "Some Chinese-American advocates say the company's decision smacks of second-class citizenship"

    No, it's actually NO citizenship.
    I've Been Boo'd

    I've been Frosted






    Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.

    Eleanor Roosevelt

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NE Pa.
    Posts
    3,189
    Gee Donna (miss ya hehe)............ sorry but I agree, no rules followed, no money cometh.
    Our daughter won a 1000.00 shopping card to a local grocery chain, lost it because her sister works for a different branch of the chain, oh well ,fine print stated" members of family or employess of any of our parent or subsidiary companies not eligible...." She didn't read all the print, and was bummed but agreed with the decision.

  3. #3
    Whatever...but PLEASE..there is a difference between legal resident and citizen. Those two terms get tossed around as if they are the same thing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Land of the Ducks...quack!
    Posts
    7,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwina's Secretary
    Whatever...but PLEASE..there is a difference between legal resident and citizen. Those two terms get tossed around as if they are the same thing.
    Indeed, and they are not the same. Legal resident means the mother was here LEGALLY wether she be a citizen or here on a visa or whatever. If the contest said Legal Resident, she is elegable, if it said Citizen than she is not.

    If it were me, I'd fight for it on the technicallity alone. People need to learn to use proper phrasing, especially when it comes to matters of money.

    *edit* Im not sure if it said the woman was a legal resident or not...if she isn't than the issue is moot really.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio USA
    Posts
    11,467
    The child was DEPRIVED money for her education? Hello? Here we go with the entitlement theory. There was no deprivation.

    If the rules stated X and she/her mother didn't qualify, then, it goes to the next person.

Similar Threads

  1. Toys "R" Us Birthday Club
    By sumbirdy in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2011, 11:13 PM
  2. Found "MADE IN USA" dog toys
    By MoonandBean in forum Dog Health
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 01:03 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 11:47 AM
  4. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-27-2004, 09:59 PM
  5. Do your cats "talk" to thier toys?
    By Efrat in forum Cat General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-25-2002, 07:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com