Quote Originally Posted by 347fairless
What an ignorant line of thought...

Unattended dog + tresspassing = Defending (Fair)

Shooting or killing = 1st defense option (Moronic)

Get where I'm going with this lady? If your little doggies nip at my heel, I have the right to stomp there heads into the pavement because I was holding my child, right? Or is it only OK to shoot a dog because of size? Which is it

When a dude wips out a gun to shoot a dog that was not in any way menacing, gues what, he's a REDNECK

I'm sorry if you got a little defensive when the term was used, and you probably dropped your Busch beer and stained that Dale Earnheart t-shirt you were wearing, but the shoe definetly fits in this instance... The child was in a vehicle, away from the dog that was located in the backyard, now maybe most of the vehicles on blocks in your front lawn are missing doors, or glass, but I can assure you this one had both.

LOLOL. That is pretty funny. I, too, wonder- if the guy had enough forethought to leave his 'child' in the car, to enter the home, grab and load a gun, and come out and shoot the dog, he had enough time to enter the home, grab a phone, and call the police. Come on....dogs wander onto my property all the time. I have a child. My first thought is to get Jonah securely placed, then do the same to the dog.

REDNECK. Heaven forbid some child wanders onto his property...like maybe a teenager? He might have to shoot the kid 'cause you don't know what he might do.

Our world is not perfect. Leashes break. Fences break. Doors that one thought were locked weren't. What happened to common sense?

RIP, OFFICER. You were taken long before your time by an act of stupidity.