Yes it would make me angry if that's the case. Do you have any suggestions where I can find current information on that?
Yes it would make me angry if that's the case. Do you have any suggestions where I can find current information on that?
You keep switching back and forth on this between "won in court" and a settlement with a gag order. Won in court would mean a trial, jury verdict, etc... which against a major company would have been published and easily found. A settlement is a different matter entirely, and is normally the company saying screw it, it's going to cost us more to go to court than settle it, and there are normally gag orders attached to that type of settlement.
Frankly, I don't believe the chain of events as you have posted them.
suit your self..
On what bluebird- what countries eat dogs and cats? Some of the Asian countries. They also have a ban on ethoxyquin.Originally Posted by bluebird
If I remember right, its still banned in Canada and England. ( but they dont consume dogs and cats.. at least not to my knowledge. )
The MSDS for ethoxyquin lists and LD-50 at 800mg/Kg acute oral toxicity. For such a "dangerous" product that is an unusually high LD-50. THe MSDS also lists no known carcinogenic effects, just contact irritation.
So does hydrogen peroxide, but if injested it will cause vomiting.
No offense, but I am supposed to be resting with major surgery coming this week.
I noticed alot of people were feeding raw, and felt safe to share my story with you all. Most are in a agreement. If what you are feeding works for you fine- mine does now, but really I am not interested in a witch hunt . Talk to you later on other posts- take care..
Basically, if you can't back up the post with scientific facts, don't make the accusations.
BTW,H2O2 causes vomiting mainly because it is a base, mixing a base with acid causes the creation of gas, gas bloats the stomach and causes vomiting. (unless ingested in a strong enough concentration to cause tissue damage, then you have more to worry about than the vomiting)
I already have the facts. I know what I do and got what I got. Have a nice day...
MSDS can vary from manufacturer to Manufacturer. Some also Say "Ethoxyquin may be harmful by ingestion and through skin contact, and "is" a skin and eye irritant. If anyone is really searching for a good dog food here is a catolog that will tell you everything (ingredient) that is in the product.Lady's HumanThe MSDS for ethoxyquin lists and LD-50 at 800mg/Kg acute oral toxicity. For such a "dangerous" product that is an unusually high LD-50. THe MSDS also lists no known carcinogenic effects, just contact irritation.
http://www.solidgoldhealth.com/catalogue/catDog.pdf
Tim ~ Majestic Collies
"Just when you think there are no Angels, a Collie comes into your life""Life is not measured by the number of breaths we takebut by the moments that take our breath away"
GIVE ME THE HELPLESS, THE LOST, THE HOMELESS LITTLE ONES STRUGGLING TO LIVE; SEND THESE WEAK,ABANDONED LIVES TO ME, I OFFER HOPE, CARE, WARMTH AND MOST OF ALL LOVE,
Pledge of a Rescue Worker
MSDS's are created from a centralized database, and have to be cross checked before publication, per OSHA. Multiple MSDS's can vary in wording, but CANNOT vary in hazard content.
The one I have says the same thing. It was told that the one that states low was for use in small doses of application. When it was used for a few years in pesticide Roundup, they changed it to more toxic for handling etc.Originally Posted by MajesticCollies
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks