View Poll Results: DO U THINK DEER HUNTING OR ANY KIND OF HUNTING IS WRONG?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • DEER HUNTING IS WRONG

    3 5.26%
  • DEER HUNTING IS OK

    28 49.12%
  • ANY HUNTING IS WRONG

    18 31.58%
  • ANY HUNTING IS OK

    8 14.04%
Results 1 to 15 of 64

Thread: Do You Agree With Deer Hunting?????

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    4,243
    Well I seem to have a different opinion than most people who posted, so I will say what I think at least.

    I think hunting is a lazy way to "bring balance" to overpopulation. What about reintroducing natural predators and setting up preservation or conservation areas for them to live in? Too often we rely on a "quick fix" that will really not help the problem in the long run. Unless we keep shooting and killing overpopulated animals there will be no "balance." It's people's fault that it is this way, and I think it should be our responsibility to fix it, in the most natural, humane way possible.

    I also have a big problem with bears and other animals that ARE NOT overpopulated being hunted. It's disgusting in my opinion to kill for sport. Also, growing up in the midwest I know that MOST hunters DO NOT use the animal for food. I had a friend whose father had 20 deer carcasses piled up in his garage every deer season.

    I also think hunting is dangerous. Too often, you hear of hunting accidents (even the vice president accidently shot a friend) and pets being accidently killed because the hunters thought they were a deer or something.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with my nose in a book
    Posts
    3,972
    Hunting is ok as long as you use all of any animal you hunt and that you hunt during the right season.I don't agree with just shotting an animal and not using the animal for meat,clothing,ect...
    Nikki[human],Zippy[tabby],and Pumpkin[orange tabby]
    Rest in Peace my Sweet Hammie Zoey
    Jan 1,09-March 26,2010

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by Pembroke_Corgi
    Well I seem to have a different opinion than most people who posted, so I will say what I think at least.

    I think hunting is a lazy way to "bring balance" to overpopulation. What about reintroducing natural predators and setting up preservation or conservation areas for them to live in? Too often we rely on a "quick fix" that will really not help the problem in the long run. Unless we keep shooting and killing overpopulated animals there will be no "balance." It's people's fault that it is this way, and I think it should be our responsibility to fix it, in the most natural, humane way possible.

    I also have a big problem with bears and other animals that ARE NOT overpopulated being hunted. It's disgusting in my opinion to kill for sport. Also, growing up in the midwest I know that MOST hunters DO NOT use the animal for food. I had a friend whose father had 20 deer carcasses piled up in his garage every deer season.

    I also think hunting is dangerous. Too often, you hear of hunting accidents (even the vice president accidently shot a friend) and pets being accidently killed because the hunters thought they were a deer or something.
    Ditto Ditto Ditto
    See ALL my pets here
    Dogs:Pixie.Shrek
    Cats:Milo.Duck.Hank.Molly.Zoe

    R.I.P:Thunder.Rockee

  4. #4
    I have yet to meet a hunter who doesn't use the animals taken for food. You can't base an entire group on the actions of one. The person with 20 deer carcasses piled up in his garage wasn't following hunting laws, as most states have a VERY low per hunter bag limit on deer, except for nuisance herds.

    As to bears not being overpopulated, in some areas they have an extremely high population. NY, NJ, some parts of Mass, all are having problems with bear overpopulation and the ensuing human/bear run ins.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human

    As to bears not being overpopulated, in some areas they have an extremely high population. NY, NJ, some parts of Mass, all are having problems with bear overpopulation and the ensuing human/bear run ins.
    The only reason there over populated is because US humans have taken over so much land and there's not enough room for the poor bears to spread out by.

  6. #6
    Actually, there's more woodland in Mass now than there was in the 1800's.

  7. #7
    Yes SOME areas have more land than others but on WWF they showed many acres being cut down and bears did not have enough room same for wolfs.

    I still want more land for the animals than humans.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Windham, Vermont, USA
    Posts
    40,861
    Quote Originally Posted by Argranade
    Yes SOME areas have more land than others but on WWF they showed many acres being cut down and bears did not have enough room same for wolfs.

    I still want more land for the animals than humans.
    Have you ever looked at population density maps for your own province? I am certain that in Ontario, there's more land for animals than people, just not in the city.

Similar Threads

  1. 933... Do you agree with it or not?
    By belterv in forum Pet Poll
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-27-2006, 05:04 PM
  2. We're going deer hunting!!
    By kingrattus in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-16-2004, 04:52 PM
  3. DEER Oh DEER!!! **Pics**
    By NYCbabi 13002 in forum Dog General
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-14-2003, 03:09 PM
  4. How many of you agree with going to war.
    By sarahevans742 in forum Dog House
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 06-02-2003, 04:44 PM
  5. Deer Hunting
    By teena in forum Dog General
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-08-2000, 06:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com