Exactly...Originally Posted by lizbud
wonder how much money goes into that.
when the money could go for helping people out..
instead of spending it on a bunch of stupid paint.![]()
Exactly...Originally Posted by lizbud
wonder how much money goes into that.
when the money could go for helping people out..
instead of spending it on a bunch of stupid paint.![]()
Hardly animal abuse. it may be stupid but it is not abuse. I mean people dress up their dogs in CLOTHES for crying out loud. I doubt it feels really good to have an extra layer on and it probably messes with their hair but no one screams abuse about that. Sitting pretty is probably uncomfortable for Teddy but he still does it if I ask. Is that abuse? NO.
I think people are being a little sensitive about paint on an elephant. he may not be jumping for joy but how do you know the paint feels the same to him as it does on your skin. maybe it feels like a mudbath. You don't know, you are just assuming.
Like I said painting an elephant for art is stupid but not abuse.
Vette, that's a wonderful thought. putting the money towards something good instead of buying paint BUT painting is what gives him the money to buy the paint in the first place. if he doesn't paint he doesn't make money.
R.I.P my dear Sweet Teddy. You will be missed forever. We love you.
http://www.hannahshands.etsy.com
One, the artist had to rent an elephant. Not cheap. Two, he had to get the paint. Assuming it's body paint, again, not cheap. It was a piece of "performance art". the painting wasn't sold, he essentially rented out his time.
Again, a fiberglass mockup would have been just as effective.
I agree. I may not like it or think it's art either but abuse??Originally Posted by sparks19
People "paint" dogs and cats and horses, I see no one screaming abuse about that. Some of them can be quite gorgeous, as per the link posted above
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks