Fun times! I remember doing that for Halloween contests at the stable.Originally Posted by animal_rescue
![]()
Fun times! I remember doing that for Halloween contests at the stable.Originally Posted by animal_rescue
![]()
"Did you ever notice when you blow in a dog's face he gets mad at you?
But when you take him in a car he sticks his head out the window." -- Steve Bluestone
I would think paint over some fur (such as on a horse) would feel different than paint directly on the skin. The paint is clogging the skin pores it would seem like, on the elephant, whereas on a horse, the paint is over the hair and not directly on the skin so much... I could be wrong though. I don't know much about the elephant's situation, but my first inclination is that I don't care for it.
Technically, I don't think this is abuse. But I'm sure the elephant doesn't favor this...
♥
Jasper
[Irish Setter]
Gah, what a pointless thing to doPaint is for paper, not elephants.
My argument against this is simple. Wouldn't the artistic statement have been served just as well by a fiberglass elephant instead of a live animal?
I know what it feels like to have most of the pores on my body (Arms, legs and face) clogged with camo paint. I can't see the elephant feeling much better.
Good grief, I just saw this on the CNN site - and my first reaction was WHY, WHY, WHY, do you need to paint an elephant.
Completely unnecessary and outrageous.
An elephant as art? AN ELEPHANT 'IS' ART - IN ITS NATURAL STATE - YOU IDIOT!!
Sorry for the rant, but these kind of things really get me going............in the wrong direction.
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks