Purina Mainstay?

[Giselle]

If Mainstay combined all the corn ingredients, you'd end up with a very short ingredient list: corn, soybeans, beef and bone meal. I don't know. It still looks pretty yucky to me.

I'm also curious where you got your chicken definition from. This is what I found:

Chicken is the clean combination of flesh and skin with or without accompanying bone, derived from the parts or whole carcasses of chicken- exclusive of feathers, heads, feet, and entrails.

- AAFCO's definition

I also can't see how 0% protein is beneficial for a dog. Even dogs raised on vegetarian diets need substantial protein. How can a dog possibly survive and thrive on a 0% protein diet? I agree with Kay. I prefer to see no corn at all in a dog food. It doesn't matter how they space out their ingredients on the list. The fact is that corn is an undesirable ingredient and I would not feed anything that listed corn on the list.

Bri, can you buy Pro Plan? It's not the best, but it is loads better than other Purina products and it's fairly easy to find. I'm not sure how expensive it is, but I imagine no Purina product would be that costly.

Also, while it is claimed that Mainstay tested negative for pentobarbitol. It is undeniable that Mainstay and other Purina brands contain BHA. Hmm, carcinogens or anesthetics? It's up to you to choose the worse of two evils.

[IRescue452]

AAFCO also accepts dehydrated garbage as a proper ingredient. You really want to take their definition for something?
Kfamr, why would you want to feed anything with pentobarbitol? Doesn't that raise any red flags to you at all?

[Giselle]

AAFCO is currently the most reliable source for the validity of dog food ingredients unless you can show me some other organization that dedicates itself to verifying the quality of dog food. I'm curious, what ingredient is "dehydrated garbage"?

That reminds me, is Mainstay even tested by the AAFCO?

IRescue, in the same sense, why would you feed anything containing BHA/BHT/ethoxyquin/propylene glycol?

Bri, I don't want to hijack your thread, but I hope this is a neat education process

[Kfamr]

I"rescue"452, I don't feed and well never feed any of the foods mentioned in this thread - but, thanks for your concern.

[K9soul]

Wow, I'm not even going to begin addressing all those statements, I honestly just don't have the time, though I hope others will (some already have). I just want to say if you think Purina doesn't use beet pulp you might want to look through more of their formulas. They don't use it in all formulas but they most certainly do in some of them. I know for sure some of the Pro-Plan and Selects formulas do as I just looked at their ingredients the other day when someone asked about Selects.

[IRescue452]

I agree that corn isn't an ingredient you look for, but I don't agree why you are saying mainstay is a bad food based on corn, it has the same amount of corn as the other foods mentioned in this thread. I'm not saying its the best food, I'm just defending the fact that it is an ok kibble to feed.

Yes its aafco tested and conforms with aafco, what does aafco mean about anything? Aafco says that dog foods should say 100% complete on the bag even though new nutritional info is found everyday. As far as I'm concerned, AAFCO on the label means nothing about quality. Here's a better authority, Common Sense. Thats why I feed raw and why she tried feeding raw, AAFCO doesn't approve that dogs should be fed raw, they only approve kibble.

Quote: "Not to mention, splitting the corn up doesn't really help their food any, if you add it all up there is more corn in it than anything else"
I meant splitting it up on the label, mainstay DOESN'T do this while other companies do.

[Vela]

AAFCO also accepts dehydrated garbage as a proper ingredient. You really want to take their definition for something?
Kfamr, why would you want to feed anything with pentobarbitol? Doesn't that raise any red flags to you at all?

Kay doesn't feed food with phenobarbitol in it....neither do a good portion of those of us in this thread. I have fed three foods to my dogs in their lifetimes, Canidae, Chicken Soup, and now Innova EVO, neither of those three have any of those offensive things you mentioned. I also prefer to feed food with no corn in it. It's not really a good food for animals or people. It won't kill you but it is VERY often a source of allergies in dogs from their food. Not sure where you get your facts but 0% is not okay and beet pulp is used as filler, just like corn, just like the "fiber". Dogs don't NEED all that fiber. If they are fed a good diet, raw, or HIGH QUALITY kibble, their stools are fine without needing all that fiber, which is really just another name for filler, to make the dog feel full without actually giving it any kind of nutritional value at all. If that is all someone can afford to feed their dog okay, at least it's being fed, but to truly beleive it's a good quality food boggles my mind.

Look at that list, IMO the Premium and super premium and performance foods are even still a whole bunch of crap, but still better than the bottom dregs. Look at what's at the bottom, that food is even at the bottom of the "crappy food list". So I just can't see how anyone can really truly think it's a great food.

Dehydrated garbage is okay for some....because that's what this stuff is, IMO.

Not to mention, splitting the corn up doesn't really help their food any, if you add it all up there is more corn in it than anything else. How about you eat mostly corn and tell me how healthy you are. It's not digestible by humans or dogs in any unseful form and is actually on of the worst vegetables for people or dogs to eat, if you want to get down to brass tacks. Why do you think it comes out whole on the other end???

http://www.gooddogmagazine.com/drydogfood.htm