Personality Disorder ???

[Lady's Human]

Es, If they were captured as armed civilians on the battlefield, then there is a special section of the GC dealing with them. (in short, they have no GC protection)

If they were captured for another reason, then they should get trials. Military trials were accepted practice in these cases previously, and the USSC has just set out the map to follow to do just that. Now if congress would just get off their tuckusses and actually DO something, maybe there can be some progress.

[Edwina's Secretary]

Now if congress would just get off their tuckusses and actually DO something, maybe there can be some progress.

Now you are blaming the delay on congress? Are you sure it isn't the press?

Round up the ususal suspects....

I still ask the question. Do you believe them innocent until proven guilty?

[Lady's Human]

ES, personally, congress habitually (regardless of who is in charge) does nothing until the crisis they are reacting to has already passed. They do a good job of emulating most bureaucracies.......delay, deny, overreact.

I thought I was being fairly clear. For those who do not fall under GC provisions for non-uniformed combatants (Referred to in the GC language as illegal combatants), yes, they should get military tribunals. As in innocent until proven guilty.

[lizbud]

Now officals are releasing the cause of his discharge was "antisocial
personality disorder". I can believe that, the guy is a criminal deviant.


http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2155495