Well I choose to take it with a grain of salt until the entire truth comes out about what happened. Not to mention, I don't beleive the person had 25,000 dollars in vet bills from that incident. It is possible, but very unlikely, as even some of the worst cases of injury or harm haven't cost people that much money in vet bills, and that includes major surgeries. Things like chemotherapy, etc etc may cost that much over time, but not one incident such as this. I truly have a hard time beleiving they spent that much in vet bills, without more poof of it, and until that time I'm not buying one side or the other. Not to mention it was a worker, no Cesar himself, who is accused of the crime, and it is possible he did something wrong, but that doesn't mean Cesar endorsed it, we just don't know the facts yet. People shouldn't instantly beleive what the media says just because it's in print. More facts are needed to make an accurate assessment.


Most who dislike his methods seem not to realize that he often deals with the worst of the worst dogs, those who would be put down if not given another chance. While I have seen very few instances of him using stronger methods than I would prefer, I also see him dealing, at those times, with very aggressive dogs. I choose to wait and see, rather than jump up and down saying he's wrong, I also beleive he HAS helped a lot of people with their dogs.