Quote Originally Posted by K9soul
Umm I read the article and found it to be objective and no false information, with plenty of facts you can find on many other websites about docking and cropping. I felt it summarized it nice and simply without going into rabid arguments for or against it. Maybe you could point out what in that article was incorrect or false information. If you feel it's the part about where docking originated as a means to prevent rabies, that is easily proved or disproved by looking around more. Here are some more sites that give that bit of info.

http://www.schnauzerclub.co.uk/docking.shtml

http://www.pethealth.com.au/index.cf...wysiwyg_id=159

http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pro.../LA20040406004

http://www.animallaw.info/articles/d...ingdocking.htm

to name just a few.

I never said "use wikipedia to research any questions." I said that particular article was informative on docking/cropping and why it was started, and what countries are banning it etc. I swear people just look for things to nitpick on here sometimes and it makes me hesitant to even post lately.
No need to get hasty. I didn't even read the info, I just wanted to warn people that it may not be correct. In no way, k9soul, was this some personal attack on you. No need to question posting on Pet talk because of this! You are a highly valued member!
All I know is that Wikepedia is banned from using in almost every school around here because of the incorrect info. Every bit of information I have seen from that site has been incorrect or twisted in some sort of way. Maybe this is different though!

I swear people just look for things to nitpick on here sometimes and it makes me hesitant to even post lately.
I also think that a big problem is that people blow friendly statements out of proportion!