Originally posted by IRescue452
Hold on just a minute... I'm still under the impression that none of the terrorist attacks were from people from Iraq. Did I miss something?
You are right about that but we are there because of 9/11.

This is the way I see it, & please feel free to disagree:

After 9/11 our government declared war on terrorism.
Iraq seemed to be filled with them, including their leader.
Bush was given info (whether correct info or not, blame the CIA for this mess up), that Saddam had WMD and would use them. He had in fact used them on his people before (mustard gas on the Kurds).

I'm still not convinced there weren't any WMD that got moved out of the country, but that is neither here nor there. (Of course if the Media hadn't blabbed that we Might attack Iraq, there may have been a different discovery).

Anyway, whether we should or shouldn't be there, there we are! We can't abandon them like we did Afghanastan when Bush Sr. ran out.