Yeah, I know there are bad SPCAs and other shelters out there. Maybe I am overly naive, but I just can't fathom someone being in RESCUE for PROFIT. It seems so absurd to me because I've been doing rescue and have lost tons of money, not gained any.

Even though 120 dogs aren't against the law, I still have to side with the people who took them away. Maybe not legal, but definately in the best interest of the animal.

I just thought the article was very one-sided and they didn't quite do enough investigating. Of course people who have had their animals taken away will talk badly about the shelter since they're bitter and want revenge. I would like to have seen it be more neutral.

I dunno. I think there are tons more good shelters than bad ones, so that is why the article upset me. I just dont want anyone to watch the show then be hesitant to help out their local SPCA.