Originally posted by aly
**edit** Grr, I just noticed there were 4 pages of the article and read the rest of it. It really made me mad with the way they portrayed that. All of the cases they described sounded valid and reasonable to me. I seriously do NOT think a good "breeder" would have 120 DOGS There's no way she could properly care for ALL of them, no way. And it doesn't matter what they're worth... the shelters will not charge $600 just because a dog is pure-bred. Some of them may have slightly higher prices for pure-breds, but most don't.
I just saw your edit and wanted to say I agree with having 120 dogs.......no one should have that many dogs. But again, not against the law, sadly. As from what the show said, her vet even said there was no real reason to take them away and if I remember right, this was a vet that worked for the SPCA. Till he spoke against them in this case, now he no longer works there.

As for all the reason sounded valid, I think it's something to see, not read to get a full image of things. It's that legal stand point again, legally they where ok, what we believe is right.........thats a different story.

But I have to add after seeing some of these places, they where not the best, but in watching, most where still better then our local SPCA set up here. Maybe I need that SPCA to come over here and shut down my SPCA.