well I admit I of course,can't say I know for sure if they have souls or not...but, being man made, I really don't see how they could, since in my opinion anyway, people are born with souls from God, but that's just my opinion, and I don't want to make this cat site into something else...anyway it seems like there are already too many people running around without souls, and we sure don't need any more over-population on earth, LOL.I'm against it too. But I do think that just because they are clones, doesn't mean they don't have souls, like toughCookie originally said. But I just don't see the POINT in cloning... I could understand it and hell, I'd probably even be for it if the cloned animal/human/whatever would be the same. But the thing is, the clones aren't the same. They just LOOK the same, they don't have the same personality, the memories of the original or anything. So that's why I'm against it... There just isn't a point and I don't like scientists toying with Mother Nature. It isn't right and I can bet anything it'll come back to haunt us one day.![]()
even if they were the same in looks AND personality, I don't think it would be right, people are suposed to be born, not man-made by mad scientists!
Like I said before, the only good thing that can come of this new technology would be the medical advantage, maybe for transplants or whatever. I don't know, just don't know how all that would work. My father needed a heart transplant, never got it, so that's why I say that.
I totally agree with the last part of what Ann said,about Mother nature, and it probably will come back to haunt us ...terrible thought, but true.
ok getting back to the pettalk , I still wouldn't want a clone, I think it would take away from the memory of the real pet.![]()
Bookmarks