We are debating the same issues in Australia. And I agree that it's a sign of a democratic country that there are differing opinions being expressed. I also agree that, whatever the legislation, educating the public is important. But I also believe that legislation can be educative in itself....it can 'lead' public opinion, not just follow it.
One angle I'd like to see emphasized is that there should be REWARDS for the breeders who do the right thing...in terms of number of litters, health & welfare of their dogs, and careful screening & placement of their puppies.
I'd like to see a peak animal welfare body (like our RSPCA) be given inspection & monitoring rights which would permit them to rate breeders as RSPCA- approved, if they meet all standards. The public would be educated on the advantages of dealing directly with breeders who have been given that rating. Hopefully, the non-RSPCA- approved breeders & dealers would then find their customers drying up... One way to get rid of the unethical dog breeders & sellers is to direct their customers elsewhere!
Our new Companion Animal Laws here give the RSPCA powers to go into any location & check concerns about dog & puppy welfare. Well, if they can go in to punish those who trangress against animal welfare laws, they could also go in to monitor & reward with an approval- rating those breeders whose procedures are exemplary. And the public would have access to that information.
Marie