wowOriginally posted by dukedogsmom
Just like O.J. was and probably Michael Jackson will be. Money talks.
there are so many differences between OJ's and Blake's case its not funny... plus the wife had very questionable background with some not so good people, the evidence was circumstancial at best.
and how dya know MJ is guilty? He's a freak, no doubt, but that does not equal guilty. if he is, fry him. but if he isn't, he's still a freak.
i haven't followed blake's case too closely, but I though most of it was circumstancial and they didn't find CONCRETE/DNA proof that he did it? just because he played a bad guy on tv doesn't mean he was one in real life.
but i'd have to see all the evidence to give my solid opinion on his guilt or innocence.
as for that phone call, that sucks for you! wish ya DID have *69 (though sometimes THAT doesn't help either!). but if people are persistent enough they might be able to get your information (i.e. it might not have been blake).
Bookmarks