Originally posted by stacwase
You know - rather than banning certain breeds of dogs, they should pass more rules regarding the owners. If a person has a pit bull, rottweiler, or other "disreputable" breed and it bites somebody or attacks another dog, that person have to go to court to determine whether or not they can ever have another dog.
I agree. However, the man who is responsible for this law doesn't think this way. He has outright said that he thinks pit bulls are inherently vicious; that no matter what they eventually turn. Obviously he hasn't looked into statistics. He should not be in politics.