Originally posted by Suki Wingy
wait, is this the same one that we signed the pettition for?
No, that was the Georgia ban petition.


Here are the new rules.
The owner of a restricted dog shall have liability insurance specifically covering any damages for personal injury caused by the restricted dog in an amount not less than one million dollars.

Care and control of restricted dogs

6(1) The owner, or any other person having care and control of any restricted dog, shall at all times when the restricted dog is off the property of the owner, have the restricted dog
(a) under control;
(b) muzzled; and
(c) held on a leash not exceeding two metres in length.

6(2) The owner, or any other person having care and control of any restricted dog shall, at all times when the restricted dog is on the property of the owner, have the restricted dog
a) indoors;
(b) outdoors, secured in a fully enclosed pen; or
c) outdoors, muzzled and secured by a chain fixed to the property that prevents the restricted dog from coming closer than two metres to the apparent boundary of the property.

(4) No person may keep, or permit any other person to keep, on his or her property, more than two restricted dogs

7(2) A peace officer or animal control officer who has a reasonable and honest belief that a dog is a restricted dog within the meaning of this Act may proceed as if the dog were a restricted dog under this Act and enforce the terms of this Act accordingly.