Originally posted by sirrahved
I think it's fine if people don't want to let others live in their establishments because of pets. Animals can do damage (look at my spraying cat--all over our rented apartment!)
OK then, I can see the logic of the pet surcharge. I also see the reason why many companion pet bills are stalled.Maybe that is where Hawaii's bill is. There has to be restrictions in the bill, maybe limit the companion bill to 1 pet, and size/ weight. etc. I guess when you are thinking Condo/apartment that when choosing a pet common sense would prevail. Not the case.