your evidence states:

Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief. Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates. These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data, new interpretations, or demonstration of error. This contrasts with science, where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge.
Anything proven by the scientific method is a fact and therefore science, right? Well if evolution is a theory then it hasn't been proved by the scientific mehtod and therefore isn't a science. And yet it is taught as though it were a science and a fact. It is taught in schools everywhere as a fact. Creation, however, is only a "claim of supernatural intervention in the origin of life"
If evolution is a "theory" then it is just as religious creation.
I think I see a double standard. hmmmm