I feel the same way sometimes. If I owned an insurance company, I honestly would not want to insure pit bulls, rotts, chows, etc., even though I own a Rott - and know how great they are.
A somewhat realistic solution would be to require all dogs of "dangerous" breeds to undergo some kind of test. Like a CGC test maybe.
On another note, I do think it's rather pathetic that they can't even get the breed names right. There is no such thing as a "Staffordshire Terrier".
I’d assume they are talking about Staffordshire Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Terriers. Instead of bringing up both, they are probably just lumping them into one category.
Bookmarks