Quote Originally Posted by Grace View Post
So what did she have to say about this case?

I read over on Yahoo news that this guy was a sort of control freak - an unpleasant stickler for the rules who often clashed with researchers and considered the mice cages his personal fiefdom.
Nancy was her usual obnoxious self...She was trying to connect every little second had story about this guy to the crime. Why, what, how and when....

I look at things from an oblique angle.

God only knows what kind of crap this poor guy had put up with at his job.

I have worked with people who look down at the work that the paper pushers and housekeeping attendants do for them.

Some people tend to look down at people who do the dirty work at the workplace...there are people who are 'educated/have degrees' that do not walk on the surface of the planet and have no problem reminding people that they possess a degree-too bad it does not come with common sense and manners.

No, I am not making excuses for this nitwit, but I am very cautious when it comes to the sensationalization of crime cases.

Case in point?

The recent "group rape" of a woman which turned out to be a lie. The woman consented to the acts and then later blamed the men of assaulting her.

Good old Nancy G went ballistic and convicted the Duke lacrosse players of also gang raping a woman and being everything - except innocent before being proved guilty. We all know that also was a false accusation leveled at those poor schmuck-who really should have known better!

After that case fell apart for the prosecutors NG dropped the story and never made a public apology for slamming them. This case sounds like a 'slam dunk', but until the evidence shows the guy killed Le, I am not going to believe anything.