Yes RICHARD, you have admirably tried to stay out of the fray.

But as you admit (I think) to not being a woman let me explain some things to you.

Because a politican has, has had or will have mense does not mean I have to support her.

Females are allowed to disagree with other females.

Just as blacks do not have to agree or support every black person who runs for political office.

Just as I KNOW you do not agree with every politican with gonads.

Does that mean you are
nasty, vengeful, mean spirited and just plain rude?
Or do you reserve that for women who disagree with other women?

And...based on your misogynistic rant (again!)...how do you justify the men who disagree with Ms. Palin's politics. You know...like George Will?

Let me explain to you...the criticism I have seen on this and other threads from women has been about Ms. Palin political positions, statements, actions and qualifications.

Not how she tilts her head, the jewelry she does or doesn't wear, the name she chooses to use, what she does or doesn't look like naked, or any of her body functions.

It is possible to see Ms. Palin as a politican -- irrespective of gender. And agree or disagree accordingly.

Your defense of Ms. Palin does puzzle me as you usually have such disdain for successful women.

Gosh darn it all!