Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Body armor for American troops

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kentucky, LAND OF THE EASILY AMUSED
    Posts
    25,224

    Body armor for American troops

    Dateline-NBC did an 'expose' on a new type of body armor that may save the lives of soldiers at war.

    This was the third piece I have seen on the 'Dragon Skin" type of armor.
    The first time I saw it was on the Discovery Channel and then on 'Mail Call'
    on the History channel.

    Dragon Skin is a type of armor that looks like reptile scales. It's flexible and covers more of a soldier's torso than the current Interceptor armor. Interceptor armor is a plate style of armor that fits into the pockets of a vest-it's rigid and doesn't extend the underarm protection that the DS style of BA does.

    There are some family members that want to purchase DS armor for their loved ones but the US Army will not allow them to wear it! The reason?
    The DS failed at extreme temps in their tests.

    In the story one of the inventors of the Interceptor BA was asked about what he would wear into combat and he answered, "Dragon Skin."


    ----------------------

    The Dateline piece was kinda stupid because they stated that this was the 'first time' that DS weas tested on TV.

    IN the first two pieces on DS that I saw, the armor was tested with multiple hits from .223, 9mm and rounds from an AK-47. It stopped all rounds shot into it.

    At the overseas lab they tested the DS against the Interceptor, they made a huge deal of stating that they would not disclose the caliber of ammo that they were going to use - because the piece would be seen by people who would try to use that info against American troops.

    They then showed .223 and AK style of cartridges being loaded.
    ----------

    I am glad to see a major network take on the subject, but was disappointed at some of the outright BS in the piece.

    ----------

    The US Armry tests the armor according to standards that they have set and won't do a side by side comparison..DS was tested by the Army but they stated that the armor failed at extreme temps and even at regular 'room' temps!

  2. #2
    DragonSkin's manufacturer has been on a PR campaign to try and force the Army to buy the armor from day one. Is it better? In some regards, However, there are ways to get the armor into the system, and running "exposees" on the news doesn't exactly win friends.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    indianapolis,indiana usa
    Posts
    22,881
    I saw this product on 60 minutes last Sunday. It looked like better
    armor to me. One General they interviewed said he & his staff wore
    DragonSkin. If it was good enough for him, it's pretty darn good.
    I've Been Boo'd

    I've been Frosted






    Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.

    Eleanor Roosevelt

  4. #4
    If a US Army General is wearing something specifically not allowed by regulation, there's an issue.

    Generals in modern combat are not engaged in combat. They are back behind the lines controlling things from HQ.
    The one eyed man in the kingdom of the blind wasn't king, he was stoned for seeing light.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    indianapolis,indiana usa
    Posts
    22,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human
    If a US Army General is wearing something specifically not allowed by regulation, there's an issue.

    Generals in modern combat are not engaged in combat. They are back behind the lines controlling things from HQ.

    I'm sure this guy knew he would be quoted, but he didn't volunteer
    this information, he only responed to a question about whether he wore
    it or not. He said he & his staff did.
    I've Been Boo'd

    I've been Frosted






    Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.

    Eleanor Roosevelt

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kentucky, LAND OF THE EASILY AMUSED
    Posts
    25,224
    Quote Originally Posted by lizbud
    I'm sure this guy knew he would be quoted, but he didn't volunteer
    this information, he only responed to a question about whether he wore
    it or not. He said he & his staff did.

    Thanks for bringing that up..I got too far into the topic to include that tidbit.

Similar Threads

  1. Support the troops....
    By mugsy in forum Dog House
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-08-2007, 02:14 AM
  2. A easy way to thank the troops...
    By Laura's Babies in forum General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-24-2006, 02:09 PM
  3. 26 May birfday: Oliver, my knight in furry armor!
    By AmberLee in forum Cat General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-26-2003, 07:23 PM
  4. Please sign this for the U.S. troops.
    By mugsy in forum General
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-14-2003, 04:01 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-26-2002, 11:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com