I do.
YES!
No.
don't know
I do.
Nikki[human],Zippy[tabby],and Pumpkin[orange tabby]
Rest in Peace my Sweet Hammie Zoey
Jan 1,09-March 26,2010
You bet!
Unless your critter is the absolute perfect example of the breed it should not be bred, period! None of this 1 litter is healthy, I want my children to witness the miracle of birth nonsense.
Fix 'em early and Fix 'em often![]()
The complete Knit-wit and occasional domestic diva.
Going to a church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.
All three of my cats are neutered. Bailey won't be neutered until he is 12-18 months old.![]()
• AMADEUS • AUGUSTUS • SEBASTIAN • THEODORE •
All of my animals are fixed!! and that is how it should be. People breed because they want money or want to have a puppy. so what happens to all the others?? they get given away to people they dont know and are either abused, abandoned or sent to a shelter. It breaks my heart!! all of my animals have been either abandoned or rescued from a shelter. There just shouldnt be so many!!! for instance, i went to a house that had a free kitten sign. I walk in and there are just cats everywhere, litter and feces everywhere and these little kitties coveed in fleas!! all because they dont fix their animals!! people need to stop!! go to a shelter and rescue a animal before breeding!! there are plenty of great animals there that just need a home and to be loved!!
Maggie,
I didn't slap you, I just high fived your Face!I've Been Boo'd!!
no. 4 of my dogs are fixed, Misty is intact and if the law stated that I must get her fixed, well too bad, the law also says dogs need to be licenced and I dont do that either, the law says dogs must be leashed,and I dont follow that. I am a reponsable pet owner who knows what I am capable of and what my dogs are capable of. yes there are irrisponsable pet owners, and I am sure a law like that would benifit the animals in their care, but the law does not differentiate between the responsable and the irresponsable. so no I will never support a mandatory spay/neuter law.
Shayna
Mom to:
Misty-10 year old BC Happy-12 year old BC Electra-6 year old Toller Rusty- 9 year old JRT X Gem and Gypsy- 10 month ACD X's Toivo-8 year old pearl 'Tiel Marley- 3 year old whiteface Cinnamon pearl 'Tiel Jenny- the rescue bunny Peepers the Dwarf Hotot Miami- T. Marcianus
"sister" to:
Perky-13 year old mix Ripley-11 year old mix
and the Prairie Clan Gerbils
yes, yes, yes.
Yes, there are responsible owners out there, and a few bad apples ruin it for everyone, and yes Jamie is still intact, but think about it. If there were laws out there that stated you MUST spay/neuter your pets, they would HAVE to create even more programs that did low cost spay/neuter, or even FREE for low income families. I know there are already some in existance but they would have to create an even better program. How would that be a bad thing? I am a responsible pet owner as well, and if you are, then you should already be following the cardinal "rules" of pet ownership, whether they were laws or not.
Yes, and I think there should be a limit for breeders on how many pups they can have, why should they be priviledged enough to get to add to the overpopulation?
"There are two things which cannot be attacked in front: ignorance and narrow-mindedness. They can only be shaken by the simple development of the contrary qualities. They will not bear discussion."
Lord John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton
I have ALWAYS said that they should make it a law that unless you are a certified breeder, all animals should be fixed. There are FAR too many unwanted animals out there.
Rest In Peace Casey (Bubba Dude) Your paw print will remain on my heart forever.![]()
12/02
Mollie Rose, you were there for me through good times and in bad, from the beginning.Your passing will leave a hole in my heart.We will be together "One Fine Day".1994-2009
MooShoo,you left me too soon.I wasn't ready.Know that you were my soulmate and have left me broken hearted.I loved you like no other. 1999 - 2010See you again "ONE FINE DAY"
Maya Linn, my heart is broken. The day your beautiful blue eyes went blind was the worst day of my life.I only wish I could've done something.I'll miss your "premium" purr and our little "conversations". 1997-2013 See you again "ONE FINE DAY"
DO NOT BUY WHILE SHELTER ANIMALS DIE!!
Well, sort of yes, and sort of no. I think all dogs should be neautered but there should be a law that a breeder has to have some kind of certifacate to be able to breed dogs, and only purebred, registered, or champion dogs.
Yes I think that proper breed specimens should have a breeding liscense or something and if someone is caught breeding two dogs to make a mutt then 2000 fine and if they breed to pures to make a mutt 1000 and if they breed two dogs that are both th same breed but dont meet the standard then they will be fined 700 thats what I would like to see. So if someone was selling pups in the paper or something then like the spca (or a company dedicated to this) would go down and make them show their lisence which should be just like a drivers lisence.
That sounds like a great idea buttercup, and I agree in part. The only problems are working dogs and HOW do you specify if a dog "meets the standard" or not. That could be rather vauge and cause problems in the systems.
Niño & Eliza
Entirely true. What constitutes a "breeding worthy" dog to a show breeder would not even pass the rigid standards of a working breeder. If you enforce a spay/neuter law, it could create even more problems with large-scale breeders since they would be exempt from the law if they obtain a kennel/USDA license. If such a law existed, it would be abused and I doubt the government would take time to enforce this law. They barely have half a mind to enforce a fine for dog licenses.Originally Posted by Suki Wingy
That's a very easy problem to fix. A BYB can enter their dog in one show and, from what you're suggesting, they will then be exempt from the law. It'd be nice to enforce a law that *encourages* spaying and neutering (deductions from taxesYES! YES! YES! there should be a law saying you HAVE to spay/neuter your dogs unless they are show dogs., enforcing the licensing fee but granting deductions from the licensing fee, etc.), but I don't think it is reasonable to enforce a law that states you MUST spay/neuter. I would not be in favor of a law so black and white. But when you have gray areas, you have more conflicts, more issues, more exceptions, more rules, more confusion, etc. No, I don't think there should be a law on fixing pets.
I don't think a large-scale spay/neuter enforcement would work, at all.
I do think fining people, educating people, offering tons more free speuter programs, and more stray animal control - would help a LOT! If people are required to pay a large amount (the amount put into the SPCA/animal control) to acquire a breeding license, and are limited on how many litters per year each household/owner is allowed to produce, it would make people think before breeding!! It should also be made illegal to not bring a pregnant bitch in for exams before and after pregnancy. Of course lots of BYB's will slip through the cracks, but anything would be better than how it is now, a free-for-all for of animal overpopulation.
I'm honestly shocked that this has not happened before now. The gov spends millons euthanizing homeless animals and caring for abused/abandoned animals. It seems like they do everything else to save money - they need to do something to help the animals!
Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com
Bookmarks