Maybe I'm seeing things differently here, but I don't see why he should talk to her. He spoke with her when her son first died - like he supposedly does to all the families that loose a son or daughter in the war.
Now she is using "strong-arm" tactics to get what she wants from him. What makes her and her efforts any different than the terrorists who kidnap a diplomat and threaten to kill him until we do something that they want? Does her "cause" justify the means - not in my book.
She has every right to protest, and that she is doing. We all know Bush isn't the brightest bulb in the lamp so his tactics may be backfiring as it would have been so much easier to just see her, let her speak her piece and then be done with her, but I do not believe he should bend to her will. If he bends to hers, why not to everyone Tom Dick and Harry who have some ax to grind with the government? Who knows, maybe somebody will threaten to light themselves on fire if he doesn't talk to them about lowering gas prices....
Ok, blast away. I'm well aware that my opinion is in the minority.
Oh, and just to clarify, if any of you remember from any of my previous posts to political threads, I am the furthest thing from a Bush lover there is. I would like to know who she voted for in the last election.
Tubby
Spring 1986 - Dec. 11, 2004
RIP Big Boy
-----------
Peanut
Fall 1988 - Jan. 24, 2007
RIP Snotty Girl
-----------
Robin
Fall 1997 - Oct. 6, 2012
RIP Sweet Monkeyhead Girl
Bookmarks