Do you approve?

[Rottieluver45]

Well I just wanted to see how many of you think that Gay marrige is appropriate. HOw many of you like iy or dislike it.

I for one am totally for it. I`m not homosexual or bisexual or anything but I think people should be able to marry the person they truly love.Ummmm I think yesterday I signed a petition againt stopping gay marriges. You can criticize or whatever I don`t mind!

There`s my opinion!

P.S. If this causes to much trouble just ask and I`ll probably delete it.

[popcornbird]

Totally, 100% against it. If there is one thing in the world Bush and I can agree on, it is this.

I wasn't going to comment on this issue, but this is the 4th thread on it and I can't keep my mouth shut any longer. I figured if you can all so freely post your opinions on this, so can I.

[Rottieluver45]

Originally posted by popcornbird
Totally, 100% against it. If there is one thing in the world Bush and I can agree on, it is this.

LOL!!

Hey, my neighbor has a sign like thing on the back of his truck that says 'OUTSOURCE BUSH'


What does that mean?

[popcornbird]

Originally posted by Rottieluver45
LOL!!

Hey, my neighbor has a sign like thing on the back of his truck that says 'OUTSOURCE BUSH'

What does that mean?

LOL! No idea..........but it sounds funny. I've seen wierd signs like that too.

[Rottieluver45]

must...go..on....google.....

[popcornbird]

From www.dictionary.com ..................

1 entry found for outsource.
out·source ( P ) Pronunciation Key (outsôrs, -srs)
tr.v. out·sourced, out·sourc·ing, out·sourc·es
To send out (work, for example) to an outside provider or manufacturer in order to cut costs.

So I guess it means to send him out of office.

[Rottieluver45]

I`m ok with that!!

[ILoveReptiles]

I'm for it. I don't think anyone has the right to tell someone else that their love is wrong just because it happens to be directed towards a member of the same sex. I am not Gay, but I think everyone has the right to do their own thing.

I think anyone who opposes it and goes so far as to try to BAN it and force their judgements on others is a narrowminded bigoted a$$hole.

No offense, but that's my honest to goodness opinion on the matter.

[RubyMutt]

I'm all for it.

I believe you should have the right to marry the person whom you love. It's no one's business to tell you who you have or do not have the right to marry. That's just absurd. Gays should have just the amount of privileges that people who are in opposite sex marriages have.

Bush made me want to hurl when he suggested that amendment.

[ILoveMyAbbyGirl]

OOoooooooohhhhhhh I'm so ready to voice my opinion on this.

What's wrong with gay people? Does anyone have something against them? If not, why not let them get married? IMO, this is so unfair to them. If THEY can't get married, then no one else SHOULD be able to get married, straight or homosexual. Why don't we ban marriages all together?

GRRRR! I'm for gay marriages. In my mind, this is so unfair to them.

[G.P.girl]

i am way for it! what people don't get is that this is the EXACT same thing that happend with blacks marrying whites...peole thought it was terrible, and wrong and it goes aganst this-that-and theother but now look, nobody really thinks muchof it anymore...why can't we learn from our mistakes?

[sweet_stormy]

im 100% for it. Y shouldnt a gay person be able to marry the one they love? i have a few gay friends and they are no different from non-gay peeps (other than the gender they like).

[smokey the elder]

I'm against legislating morality. They tried it with Prohibition and it failed miserably. I think there are a lot of more serious issues in the world than what gender one's life partner is.

[Twisterdog]

Originally posted by G.P.girl
i am way for it! what people don't get is that this is the EXACT same thing that happend with blacks marrying whites...peole thought it was terrible, and wrong and it goes aganst this-that-and theother but now look, nobody really thinks muchof it anymore...why can't we learn from our mistakes?

You have hit the nail on the head, G.P.girl. That is EXACTLY what this is like. Apparently, we are slow learners. Fifty or a hundred years ago people thought their little worlds would crumble if they had to live in the same county with an inter-racial couple. Marriage was forbidden, people were lynched, babies were rushed off to orphanages in the middle night ... or worse.

In the 1960's, people said, "Seperate but Equal" ... put blacks in their own schools, their own swimming pools, their own restaurants. As long as it's seperate from what we have, it's ok. So wrong. So very, very wrong. The very fact that it IS seperate MAKES it unequal.

Now, here in the 21st century we have people saying "Seperate but Equal" .... let homosexuals live together is they must, but don't let them get married or have joint custody of children, or sit with their dying partner in the hospital. Again ... the very fact that it IS seperate MAKES it unequal. A civil union is NOT the same as a marriage.

Homosexuality is the last bastion of the bigot. It's not politically correct anymore, or socially acceptable, to be outwardly prejudiced against people of a different race, or against women, or the handicapped. But it's still acceptable to say that homosexuals do not deserve the same rights as everyone else. Slow learners we are.

[Karen]

"Outsource Bush" - this is a reference in opposition to his policies, which has allowed more and more businesses to "outsource" jobs - for example, paying much lower wages for tech-support phone help by using people in India, which is good for India, but not good for the Americans who formerly held those jobs.

So it would mean sending him overseas, like all those jobs.

The topic of this post is a complex issue. I believe heterosexual people should hold marriage as sacred as they are screaming anout it being. If so, our divorce rate would not be so sky-high.