Hubby and I were talking at dinner about a situation someone we know is in. They are pressed against getting pointing the finger at someone cheating (not on taxes or their spouse, but cheating none-the-less) or keeping the peace and letting it go. If they let it go, nobody gets hurt this time. It doesn't affect anyone's reputation, nothing financial (yet)... its just a wrong that if the person gets away with it a few times, they'll cheat again.
So hubby and I were debating as to what's more important: doing whats right to protect yourself from being cheated on in the future, where it could have snowballing repurcussions where you DO end up losing a lot of things like money, respect, and so on. Or keeping the peace and saving a good friendship more important? Because if you keep the friendship you can be on gaurd and watch from a closer viewpoint instead of the "enemy"
Example:
Lets say the cheating in question is a boy who takes his sister's allowance money. Sis doesn't notice missing money from her piggy bank the first few times, but then it seems like there are less coins in there than the day before. Then one day she catches him in the act of raiding her piggy bank and told him not to do that again. She later complains to her older sister who says to tell mom.... but she's reluctant to complain to mom because she knows he'll be mean to her and she doesn't want to make her life miserable just because she ratted him out.
Which is better? Being the snitch -or- learning from the experience? Snitching would mean a big fight with brother, but safe money. Keeping it quiet would mean he got away with cheating several times and therefore he'll likely try to cheat sis more times til he's caught by mom.
Oh, the things hubby and I discuss!![]()
Bookmarks