Do you think more land should be presurved for nature?

[Argranade]

Do you think more land should be presurved for nature that includes forests,Marshes ect.. I think way too many houses are going up and driving wildlife to a bad life.I mean all around the world you hear about animals attacks and people shoot these poor animals because they where just doing whats right its not there fault they have less land to live on.

More and more tree's are being cut down and im getting very worried about this where im moving too hopefuly they presurve the land for nature and less polution so im realy glad where moving into the more countrey.

I wish some one would relize we need to stop building soo many homes and factories and save the land for wild life if not this earth is gona be realy messed up which has already started. And when i say someone I mean like a person who could be heard because im shur if i started telling ppl they realy woulden't care iv tried.

[lute]

yes, of course i wish there was more land for wild animals!

[Tollers-n-Dobes]

I do, I absolutely hate seeing buildings go up absolutely everywhere (especially useless ones, like Casinos every few blocks).

[.sarah]

I am glad to live in a tree-hugging city. I do not think we need more buildings. Though my parents do and are always complaining about tree-huggers.

My mom and I went to Jacksonville a couple weeks ago and everytime we go to a big city she always gets excited when the tall buildings start to become visible. She thinks it's the coolest thing. I hate it, I'd much rather see country side or a forest.

[Miss Z]

Yes, I think a lot more needs to be done to preserve the countryside. Britain has some beautiful countryside, but apparently nearly 5 million new houses and apartments are built every year on land that was made for the wildlife. I have no heart for cities. Whilst they can be good for sight-seeing and tourism, put me on a wind-swept landscape, with a couple of deer nibbling the grass roots and bird songs filling the air any day. It's sad that places like the lake district are becoming smaller as people build holiday homes and other buildings on them. This land was made for wildlife, and for people to admire its beauty.

[crazy_caique]

Yes!They need a lot more land for wildlife.They keep cutting down all the woods to build houses and apt. in my area

[shihtzulover850]

I am glad to live in a tree-hugging city. I do not think we need more buildings. Though my parents do and are always complaining about tree-huggers.

My mom and I went to Jacksonville a couple weeks ago and everytime we go to a big city she always gets excited when the tall buildings start to become visible. She thinks it's the coolest thing. I hate it, I'd much rather see country side or a forest.

Same here! Lucky you living in a tree hugging city. I think technology is cool building the buildings but I wish they were more energy efficient. *sigh*

[sparks19]

Perhaps people should stop reproducing if they don't want more houses built for those children to live in when they grow up. yes it would be nice to have more nature around but we can't just stop building houses. the population just keeps increasing. so unless everyone wants to become sterile there will be a need for more housing.

[dab_20]

Yes, I think they should preserve more land to animals, who really need it.