Well I've had enough of people speaking negatively about kill shelters, so I decided I needed to give them some credit. I know that there are good shelters that are no-kill, and I know that there are bad shelters that are kill shelters, but these aren't always the case. Shelters don't enjoy having to be the bad guys that have to euthanize, but logically somebody has to do it. Imagine if every shelter was a no-kill (and I'd like them to do this for a year to see the reaction of the citizens). There would be a capacity of 50-100 animals stuffed for life in cages. After being full, the shelters will have to turn away any new animals or start stuffing then in storage rooms or sheds. thousands of animals each day would be turned away. People would either have to euthanize the animals on their own or pay a vet to do it. If you found a stray on the street and you couldn't take it in for some reason, you would have to do something with it, and you wouldn't find a buyer because everybody has the same problem. You would have to do something with this dog that you can't keep. People who couldn't afford going to the vet for euthanasia would be forced to take matters into their hands. Dog would starve, be shot, be hanged, anything to kill them. I know its sad to think that one of our dogs could have been killed had we not rescued them, but until everybody stops breeding (including every reputable breeder, who sells non-show quality dogs as pets rather than recommending shelters) we should be commending kill shelters for being the only ones taking responsibility for dealing with the sad truth and caring about the dogs, even through humane euthanasia.
Bookmarks