I was talking with my mom about reputable breeders yesterday after watching crufts. It seems to me that it is getting so much harder to sort reputable breeders out from the crappy but publicly appealing show breeders. For instance, a certain airedale in my area is a show breeder but in no means what I consider reputable, but could pass without proper research.
She only has 2-3 three adults at a time which can be good. The female she bred for the last 3 years (or at least the one I know) has never been shown or proven in anything. The dogs are in kennels all day or outside in a fully cemented 10x10 run, they don't get to to touch grass, ever.I just hate that kennels can be considered reputable just by the fact that they have some champion titles. If a dog spends it entire life in a kennel, its not a reputable kennel to me.
My mom also brought up that the cocker rescue has a lot of "retired show dogs" and "retired breeders". This may be a reason I hate rescues. It seems all the rescues around here will take retired puppy mill dogs and call them "breeders" and not care a lick that they came from puppy mills. They support the puppy mills by taking the old dogs off their hands and letting them get more young dogs in the kennels and then pretending the mill doesn't exist. these "retired breeders" aren't socialized and aren't used to people. They need homes that are willing to put in hours of training and hosebreaking. Even the retired dogs that come from actual cocker breeders need so much work to get them to adapt to people.
I just needed to vent about breeders and how when people on here post websites asking about what we think of the breeder, we don't get the whole picture. There is so much more behind the scenes we don't see on the website. We might see the dogs having titles and health tests, but that's just a piece of the picture.
Bookmarks