SO, MUCH, WANT!!!!! small text.Quote:
Originally Posted by richard
Printable View
SO, MUCH, WANT!!!!! small text.Quote:
Originally Posted by richard
I just want a house with a back yard big enough so I could shoot a shotgun w/o people complaining!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by blue
Would you consider a water gun? :D
Or a pellet gun? ;)
People have been making fire arms as a hobby from the beginning. Now you can print your own AR lower.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2...er-600-rounds/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-n...-oscar-1743189
Congrats to the Gun Control loon (and no, not all people in favor of gun control are loons, but some certainly fit the bill) for his viewership, which evidently totals more than the population of the United States. His show even out-draws the Super Bowl!!!
From the article:
Piers’ fame is at an all-time high and his nightly CNN show is watched by between 300 to 500 million people.
And in other Gun -related news, the NRA is sponsoring the April Texas race.
Sounds like the BATFE needs to sponsor a car. After all, NASCAR has its roots in running illegal shine, it's primary series sponsor for 2 decades was Winston, the major primary sponsors for 2 teams are Budweiser and Miller, it's only logical.
:p
Better yet, have the BATFE provide the pace car.
Well, since that article came from the UK, I'd be a bit skeptical of it. Specially since no one I know of even watches his show. Can't possibly be the entire USA watching it. Of course, there might be other people in other countries watching it. :D:love:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady's Human
Okay, NY, CT and CO have now all passed laws banning possession of high capacity magazines.
Question?
Pvt. Snuffy is driving home from a national guard drill weekend.
He has his web gear because he's taking it home to clean.
In that web gear is his full battle load of 6 30 round magazines.
Does he get arrested for illegal possession when he gets pulled over for speeding? I hope so, after all, we're a nation of laws, not men. That arrest, moreover, means that he is no longer eligible to be in the military as he has committed a firearm crime, and his continued presence in the military would be a violation of the Lautenberg act. Ah well, $200,000 + down the bunny hole in search of political correctness.
Can we immediately arrest EVERY police officer in those states for possession of an illegal magazine? There are no exemptions in NY for police, can't imagine any other law reads differently as they were mainly pushed by the same people.
A five year old kills his two year old sister with his very own "Crickett" rifle! The company selling the children's rifles uses bright colors and calls them Crickett and Chipmunk. Aaaaargh Lord give me strength.
And if it had been any number of other more common causes of death, it would have gone completely unreported. However, as this fits the agenda, it gets first page press.Quote:
Originally Posted by Louie and me
If it bleeds, it leads.
But he has to have that equipment because he is a National Guardsman. But if he is a gang banger on the south side of Chicago with those six 30-round magazines, then yes, arrest him for illegal possession. And go after whoever he got the magazines from. But the National Guardsman has a responsibility to possess the appropriate equipment issued to him. I think you should only bust the Guardsman if he lets those magazines get into the wrong hands.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady's Human
Quote:
Originally Posted by cassiesmom
There's no exception in the law for the National Guard. The Guardsman, as the law currently stands, would be arrested for illegal possession with a 1 year sentence for each magazine.
And so it goes...blah..blah..blah...
And our children keep on dying...
But it is okay... as long as it is not your child who dies!
Checking back just to troll, ES?
How nice.
Explain to me how more laws (endangering a child is already illegal) would fix the latest headline? They wouldn't, more laws in fact would do nothing, but it would allow the politicians to fleece the rubes for another term in office, as they DID something. They didn't do anything substantial, but they did SOMETHING, and that's all that counts, isn't it?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The road to the complete nanny state is paved with the same material, and in both cases the pavement stinks of bovine excrement.