Quote:
Originally posted by Cincy'sMom
I guess what I find most interesting about this issue, is it all seems to come down to the word marriage.
Those who are against gay marriage, often say civil unions are okay. Many who are for gay marriage, say they are most concerned about getting the rights of a married couple, but it seems they want to be able to call it a marriage.
So if most, no matter which side of the issue they are on, are okay with gay couples being given the rights of a married couple...why is that M word so important?
I know that is making the whole issue too simplistic, but the more I hear the debate, that (to a very uneducated about the matter, me) seems to be what alot of it boils down to.
Why shouldn't I be able to call any "union" i have with my partner a Marriage? Some people associate the word marriage with the church, however as it was pointed out earlier, a man and a woman having a ceremony with a JOP is still considered a marriage. I want to be able to MARRY my gf and have it recognised. Civil unions are, IMO, a sort of a cop out. "Let's sort of give them equal rights, but we're not really because they still can't legally be married! Muahahahaha!" If you're willing to let us have a Civil Union, then why not a marriage? And if it's religion people are concerned about, what about the gay and gay friendly churches and temples, etc? Mostly, I think they're all excuses so as to not afford us the same rights as all the "breeders". ;)