Originally Posted by columbine
People who think that the free market system means we don't pay for folks who can't afford healthcare are mistaken. The only alternative to people with money paying for healthcare for people without money is "screw it, let 'em die." I don't think we're quite there yet.
But we're heading there fast, since we don't want to pay for preventative care for the indigent, so we wait until it hits the life-or-death line, when it's far more expensive to treat them under emergency circumstances, they're often so debilitated by it that they can't even work their low-wage job afterward, and some don't make it anyway.
And these aren't just the "easily written off," whether one defines that as substance abusers, mentally ill people, the unemployed, or one's ex-spouse. These are people pulling hourly paychecks for employers who'll only employ them 25 hours a week and no more, so as not to be required to pay for health coverage. So they're working 2 jobs just to cover rent, gas, and utilities - it's not like they can save up against a medical emergency. That's fine when you're 20, but if you can't afford education to get a better job, it's all you've got when you're 50. That and the Emergency Room.
Love, Columbine